Life on Severance: Comfort, Then Crisis

1

Category : Executive Search

By MARY PILON

SILVER SPRING, Md. — Paul Joegriner hasn’t worked since March 2008, when he was laid off from his $200,000-a-year job as chief executive officer of a small bank. But you wouldn’t know it by appearances.

His wife, Marzena, shuttles their two young children to private school every morning. The family recently vacationed in Virginia Beach, Va., and likes to dine on Porterhouse steaks. Since losing his job, Mr. Joegriner, 44 years old, has had several offers. He’s turned each down in hopes of landing a position comparable to what he held before.

When Severance Falls Short

Paul Joegriner attends a job fair at a university near his home in Silver Spring, Md.

Paul Joegriner attends a job fair at a university near his home in Silver Spring, Md.

The family’s lifestyle over the past year and a half has been propped up by a $200,000 severance package and another $100,000 in savings — funds the family has burned through rapidly. By Mr. Joegriner’s own calculations, the family will be out of money in six months if he doesn’t find work.

“It will be D-Day,” he says. “But on the outside, no one has any idea that we’re in trouble.”

Mr. Joegriner is a member of what might be called the severance economy — unemployed Americans who use severance pay and savings to maintain their lifestyles. Many lost their jobs in 2007 and 2008, and thought they’d soon find work. Now, they’re getting desperate. Last week, lawmakers passed a bill extending unemployment benefits up to 20 weeks. Unemployment benefits, which typically last about 26 weeks, were expected to run out for 1.3 million people by the end of the year, according to the National Employment Law Project.

The News Hub panel discusses the newest hurdle the unemployed and laid off are facing: what to do when severance and savings money runs out.

All of this is happening as the long-term jobless rate hits its highest point on record. More than a third of those who are out of work have been looking for more than six months, making this category of unemployed the biggest since the Bureau of Labor Statistics began tracking it in 1948.

Overall, companies have been eliminating or trimming severance packages. For those who do receive severance, the median pay allotted is 12.5 weeks’ salary, down from 21.8 weeks a decade ago, according to outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

But this downturn has brought heavy layoffs to the financial and auto industries, two places where generous exit packages remain more common. The dramatic changes in such sectors mean that many of the eliminated jobs will never come back. Some workers may suffer a permanent hit to their standard of living.

Those affected often have trouble accepting their diminished prospects. Hefty severance packages, while intended as a safety net, can lull the unemployed into a false sense of security. Some people continue spending as before.

“There is an end date when that severance is going to run out,” says Ellen Turf, chief executive of the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors. “At that point, the only life preserver is unemployment or getting another job….It’s an awful situation.”

When Michelle Patterson was laid off as an executive director of marketing for a publishing company in January, she figured she could subsist comfortably, at least for a while, on the $20,000 she had reserved from her savings and severance combined. She continued to eat out regularly and made daily Starbucks runs.

“It made me feel like I was still at work,” says the 41-year-old resident of Newark, N.J. She spent as much as $250 a week on networking meals and drinks with contacts. Some days, she scheduled up to four coffee meetings a day, picking up the tab most of the time. She also spent $30 a month for pedicures and $150 on her hair.

The reckoning came in August, when she examined her finances. Her condo had been on the market for six months but she’d yet to receive a single offer. Her severance and savings were nearly gone.

She finally cut her spending. She doesn’t dine out anymore. Gone are the fancy salon visits; Ms. Patterson sips Starbucks just once a week. She downgraded her cable TV to basic channels, saving $8 a month.

Ms. Patterson sometimes wishes she had cut her spending earlier. But the money spent networking and socializing, she says, has “helped [me] keep sane.” Like many of the long-term unemployed, she surfs sites like Monster.com and is a “serial résumé sender” — emailing at least 10 résumés a day. Still, “I keep running into dead ends,” she says.

Coming to terms with the new job math hasn’t been easy. Ms. Patterson’s old salary was $140,000 a year. Now she is targeting jobs paying about half that. She recently turned down a per-diem arrangement earning $250 a week, or a mere $13,000 a year, selling education software.

After working for more than a decade in New York ad shops, Chuck Hipsher moved to Detroit in 2005. He took a position at the Campbell-Ewald agency, where he helped launch the Chevrolet Silverado campaign. Raised riding in the back of his grandfather’s Chevy pickup in Iowa, Mr. Hipsher, 50, says he was “elated” at the opportunity.

He met his wife at the ad agency, and the two had a $40,000 wedding. Kelly Hipsher, 32, was laid off in October 2007 and found out she was pregnant in February 2008. A week later, Mr. Hipsher’s pink slip followed. Two months after that, the out-of-work couple moved to Greenville, S.C., to be closer to family and get a fresh start. Together, they had received about $60,000 in severance. “Now we have $600 to our name,” says Mr. Hipsher.

Although their rent was cheaper, Mr. Hipsher says the family continued to spend like before. They moved with three cars — two BMWs and a Chevy Silverado. They continued to buy cases of $36-a-bottle wine. They spent $250 a month on a cleaning lady, and Mr. Hipsher dropped $50 a week on flowers for his wife. The couple still dined out regularly.

“We were stupid,” he says. “You become accustomed to a certain lifestyle. When your world changes and things dictate that you change, you’re pretty stubborn to give things up.”

He sold the BMWs and voluntarily turned in his beloved Silverado to avoid the repo man. “It was heartbreaking,” he says. He replaced the fancy wheels with a Chrysler minivan.

Before the layoffs, the Hipshers had no debt. Today, they owe about $70,000 — including money borrowed from family members and $31,000 in credit-card debt. To hold off the collection companies that call daily, Mr. Hipsher says he is doing his best but is also considering filing for personal bankruptcy.

After a stint selling new and used BMWs on a lot in Greenville, Mr. Hipsher recently began consulting for free for a small marketing firm, “to stay busy.”

In September, a Web solutions company hired him as a marketing director. Between salary and commission, he thought he could match half his old income. But so far, he says he’s only received about $1,220. Tight for cash recently, he pawned his wife’s $12,000 wedding ring for a $2,000 loan. He has until Dec. 28 to pay back the principal, plus $500 in interest — or else he forfeits the ring.

Looking back, he kicks himself for failing to enforce financial discipline right after losing his job in Detroit. “That precious nest egg is gone,” he says.

Mr. Joegriner began his career in banking more than 20 years ago, starting out as a part-time teller in Chevy Chase, Md. Even though he was still in college, his goal was to be a CEO. He took night classes to enhance his knowledge of banking.

Mr. Joegriner says he never craved a lavish lifestyle. When the first of their two children was born in 2000, his wife left her $50,000-year-job as a paralegal.The family settled in Silver Spring rather than pricier communities nearby. Instead of tailored suits for $1,000, he bought off-the-rack styles for $300. Mr. Joegriner purchased a Mercedes five years ago, but at auction.

After losing his job, Mr. Joegriner expected to land on his feet within six months, he says. In that time, he turned down three job offers to be a chief financial officer, either because he didn’t like the salary or the description of duties, and thought he could do better. One was nearby; the others would have required the family to move out of state. All paid somewhat less than he had previously earned.

While he says he’s “not a bean counter,” Mr. Joegriner now has mixed emotions about turning down the jobs. He estimates he has sent out about 3,000 copies of his résumé thus far. His severance package included the services of an outplacement firm, but he didn’t find it helpful. “Unemployed people networking with other unemployed people has little value,” he says.

After years of being a chief executive and hiring people, it’s been a tough adjustment. Recently, he began shooting off his résumé for mid- and senior-level positions “just to try and land something.” No replies.

Mr. Joegriner’s mornings now start with a coffee run to the nearby 7-Eleven six days a week. While pouring his regular brew and a cup to take home to his wife, he calculates that by recycling the cups, he receives a 32-cent discount per $1.37 serving. That’s a savings of $3.84 a week, he reckons — even though this small “luxury” for the two of them still costs a total of about $655 a year.

Next, he typically spends a couple of hours doing home repairs. Since his layoff, he’s installed a retaining wall, put under-cabinet lights in the kitchen and tiled a kitchen backsplash for a friend. “It’s my Zen,” he says. He’s holding off outfitting a bathroom sink with a marble countertop.

By late morning, he launches into job-hunt mode. While trolling job Web sites, Mr. Joegriner toggles to a multicolored, multitabulated Excel spreadsheet that calculates the household budget, as well as the “burn rate” through the family’s dwindling savings.

Mr. Joegriner goes grocery shopping in the afternoon. Armed with coupons collected in a shoebox above the fridge, he strides down the aisles, striking out items from his wife’s list with a black pen as he goes. His brow furrows reading the fine print on a cereal coupon his wife handed him. “It says $1.50 off cereal,” he says. “But that’s only if you buy three. So, really, it’s only 50 cents off.”

He pushes his grocery cart on a Friday afternoon through the full parking lot. “Sometimes I look at all this and think, ‘Are we the only ones struggling?’ You look around and see all these cars, it’s like there’s no recession.”

Cutting expenses for their children, Ian and Skye, has been particularly tough, the couple says. Piano lessons are no more and birthday parties are small and held at home. Next year, private-school tuition, which costs $13,000 for the two children, will get the ax.

Mr. Joegriner doesn’t use the word “unemployed” in front of his children, ages 9 and 6, preferring to say that he’s a consultant and that income is patchy. Rough times have even moved him to contemplate seasonal employment this winter, “a stopgap job,” while he continues his executive job search. “Maybe something at night stocking shelves,” he says. “That way people wouldn’t have to see me.”

Mrs. Joegriner recently began looking for work as a paralegal. But finding an employer who can accommodate her schedule with the children, she says, has been difficult.

The Joegriner’s four-bedroom residence is currently worth less than their $460,000 mortgage, but they’re still making monthly payments of $2,400.

The couple is also saddled with two former residences — which they once considered investment properties. While both are income-producing, low rents and declining real-estate values mean that they barely break even. At this point, any sale would likely result in a loss.

Originally committed to staying in the Washington, D.C., area, Mr. Joegriner expanded his search. In September, the family flew to tiny Gillette, Wyo., where Mr. Joegriner was in the final interview stages for a CEO position at a credit union. The salary was $60,000 less than what he earned before, and uprooting his family from Maryland would be difficult. But they all seemed excited about a possible move.

A few days later, Mr. Joegriner received an offer and a contract. Despite the earlier enthusiasm, doubts began to surface. “What if we went all the way out there and they laid me off?” After fruitless negotiations, he turned down the job. The reason: The position didn’t include a guarantee of severance pay. Says Mr. Joegriner: “I just couldn’t take the risk.”

Write to Mary Pilon at mary.pilon@wsj.com

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125780714976639687.html


Warren Carter
is an Executive Recruiter in Qualifind, Inc. You can share your responses with Warren by e-mail at: wcarter@quali-find.com 
Qualifind, Inc. provides professional and executive search services for specific disciplines and industries throughout the U.S. and Mexico. We are a U.S. based firm with our corporate offices in San Diego, California. We have branch offices and recruiting staff in the U.S. (i.e Chicago, Austin) and Mexico (i.e. Monterrey,  Mexico City).

Pace of Job Losses Sets Stage for Quick Labor-Market Rebound

Category : Executive Search, Job

By JUSTIN LAHART
The rapid pace at which businesses shed jobs during the recession comes with a flip side: Workers will need to be hired back quickly as the economy improves.

So deep have companies cut jobs that Friday’s employment report, which showed that the U.S. economy lost a quarter-million jobs in July, was seen as a relief. Since the recession began in December 2007, U.S. payrolls have fallen by 6.7 million, according to the Labor Department. That’s a 4.8% decline, a level not seen since the late 1940s.

“Firms were unusually aggressive in cutting costs and cutting employment,” said James O’Sullivan, an economist with UBS. “The flip side of that remains to be seen, but it could mean that companies will be quicker to bring back people because they were more aggressive about getting rid of them.”

Businesses say they are running lean. Philadelphia staffing and outsourcing company CDI Corp. has seen demand for its services fall sharply in response to the recession. Its engineering services business, for example, has seen a 22% drop-off, said Chief Executive Roger Ballou. But the company has cut staff deeply enough that it doesn’t have many idle hands, and Mr. Ballou said that’s true at CDI’s customers as well.

“I’m unaware of any firm out there today that has lots and lots of people sitting on the bench, waiting for business to come back,” said Mr. Ballou. As a result, he thinks jobs will come back more quickly as the economy recovers than they did in 2001.

Milwaukee-based Wisconsin Steel & Tube Corp., which sells precut steel bars and tubes to manufacturers and machine tool shops, has seen business pick up recently as customers move to replenish inventories and is moving to add workers.

“We’re a lean company — we don’t have a VP of this and a VP of that,” said company President Joseph Teich. “We got rid of some temporary workers and some other people, but now we do anticipate hiring people.” Last month, the company brought in a salesman that a competitor had let go, and it will likely hire two shop workers this month.

To be sure, even as more companies begin to hire as the economy recovers, it could take years before payrolls reach their prerecession level. With Americans spending more cautiously in response to the massive losses in wealth associated with this recession, some jobs may simply never come back.

“We are going through an important transition in the U.S. economy away from consumer discretionary and housing expenditures towards more exports and research and development,” said Northern Trust economist Paul Kasriel. “It’s going to take a lot of time for workers to retrain and get skills in those areas.”

Moreover, with manufacturers continuing to make strides at wringing more production out of fewer workers, even as demand picks up, they may be able to hold off on hiring. Manufacturers began cutting workers in 1998, long before the 2001 recession started, and they kept cutting them through the subsequent recovery and into the current downturn.

And a quick labor-market recovery would be a break from what has happened in recent downturns. After the brief 2001 recession ended, the economy continued to shed jobs for nearly two years, and after the 1990-91 recession, jobs growth sputtered. The two experiences led economists to conclude that there had been a shift in the behavior of the job market, which in the past recovered quickly after recessions.

That said, one thing different about this recession — and one more reason the job market may come back more quickly than in the downturns of 2001 and 1990-91 — is that so many of the job losses have been at the service-related companies that have come to dominate U.S employment. Since the recession began, 3.3 million service-sector jobs have been lost, a 2.9% decline that is the largest in data going back to 1939. In comparison, the previous two recessions each saw service-sector jobs fall by 0.5%.

Many service-related firms may have a more pressing need than manufacturers to rehire workers as demand comes back.

“In our industry, staffing is driven strictly by the number of guests we have to take care of,” said Peggy Mosley, owner of the Groveland Hotel in Groveland, Calif. “In the hospitality business, that’s where we have to excel.”

With 30 employees, Ms. Mosley’s hotel, near the northern entrance to Yosemite National Park, is at its highest staffing level in 19 years of business. More Americans are vacationing closer to home, she said, and because she doesn’t cater to business travelers, she hasn’t seen the drops in occupancy many of her counterparts across the country have seen. In July, there were 140,000 fewer hotel, motel and other accommodation workers than a year earlier.

But the biggest reason jobs might bounce back quicker from this downturn than the past two recessions, said Comerica Bank economist Dana Johnson, is that the economy looks likely to see a much bigger bounce as it recovers.

Gross domestic product — the value of all goods and services produced by the economy — has fallen by 3.9% since economic output peaked last year, marking the steepest decline since the end of World War II. In contrast, the 2001 and 1990-91 recessions were among the shallowest on record.

History says that given the depth of the downturn, GDP should grow at a 6% to 8% rate over the next year, according to Mr. Johnson. But because of the financial stress that has come with this recession, he expects it will grow at a 4% rate.

“What people forget is that a deeper recession has consequences,” Mr. Johnson said. “There is a considerable relationship between the depth of recessions and subsequent recoveries.”

Write to Justin Lahart at justin.lahart@wsj.com

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124984512901117509.html