Warren Carter founded QualiFind, Inc. in 1999 to leverage his prior military recruiting experience along with his extensive business network developed in the U.S. and Mexico after leaving the U.S. Navy in 1993.

Warren joined forces with Fernando Espinosa to create a full service executive search firm that successfully bridged the cultural differences between the U.S. and Mexico and many of the foreign investors that work within North America and Mexico. Warren and Fernando serve as Senior Managing Partners of the firm and have subsequently created a separate outplacement/career transition service called QualiFind Career Transitions and an agribusiness focused recruiting/executive search practice called AgriFind.

To further enhance QualiFind's ability to service the human talent needs of their international clients, QualiFind joined the European-based executive search network of IRC Global Executive Search Partners in 2008. Since that time Warren has led a number of retained executive search assignments for both QualiFind and AgriFind clients in Europe and Asia that had business operations in either the U.S. and/or Mexico.

Warren Carter and Fernando Espinosa lead QualiFind and the subsidiary practices of QualiFind Career Transitions and AgriFind while keeping a keen eye towards the ever-changing market demands and trends for the benefit of QualiFind clients.

About Qualifind, Inc.
Qualifind provides professional and executive search services throughout the U.S. and Mexico. We are a U.S. based executive search practice with corporate offices in San Diego, California. We have branch offices along with research and recruiting staff throughout the U.S. and Mexico. | Read Complete Profile

Featured Posts

Northeast and Central Mexico Creating Jobs Mexico's maquiladora industry is experiencing some significant recovery evidenced by a substantial increase in new Greenfield projects going into Monterrey, Saltillo, Reynosa and further south in such...

Read more

Mexico is On the Rebound By Warren Carter QualiFind and AgriFind Executive Search is seeing a substantial increase in both new search projects as well as employers that are discussing new leadership hires in Mexico for Q2 and...

Read more

All the Right Moves With the best and brightest ready to bolt, CFOs will have to step lively if they hope to retain their top talent. Alix Stuart - CFO Magazine February 1, 2010 Many finance executives are keen to boost...

Read more

Contingent Opportunities On the Horizon? By Warren Carter We are seeing positive signs of an economic recovery while at the same time still seeing plenty of signs of lingering problems.  One bright spot in the job market is a marked increase...

Read more

Executive Search Projects on the Rise By Warren Carter According to the Association of Executive Search Consultants (AESC), the executive search industry is experiencing a significant increase in overall revenues.  Despite numerous trouble...

Read more

  • Prev
  • Next

Executive Search Projects on the Rise

Category : Executive Search

By Warren Carter

According to the Association of Executive Search Consultants (AESC), the executive search industry is experiencing a significant increase in overall revenues.  Despite numerous trouble spots and pitfalls remaining within the global economy, we are optimistic that we may be experiencing the beginning of a recovery.  We are seeing new search assignments in both the U.S. and Mexico

QualiFind and AgriFind Executive Search has weathered other recessions (although not as severe as this one) and we are hopefully optimistic that what the AESC is reporting is a bellwether of what is happening in the broader global economy.

The AESC reported in January 2010 that executive search industry revenues in the U.S. rose by 10.5% from July to September 2009 over the prior three months.  Also, the AESC reported that executive search assignments increased by 11% over the prior three months and the revenue per search consultant increased by 12%.

Another positive economic indicator that our agribusiness search practice (AgriFind) mirrored was a small quarterly increase (+1%) in the number of search consultants employed by executive search firms on a global basis.  AgriFind just added a new partner and practice leader due to increased opportunities available in both the U.S. and Mexico. 

The AESC report suggested an end to the massive downsizing experienced by search and recruitment firms since late 2008.  These numbers and our own small increase in building our internal talent resources is expected to bode well for a pending recovery.

However, the AESC report also urged caution due to the large year-on-year declines that are still prevalent across all regions and industry sectors.  Their report indicated that revenues for the search industry dropped as much as 34% from Q3 2008 to Q3 2009.  Let’s hope the recovery continues…

Warren Carter is an Executive Recruiter in Qualifind, Inc. You can share your responses with Warren by e-mail at: wcarter@quali-find.com

Qualifind, Inc. provides professional and executive search services for specific disciplines and industries throughout the U.S. and Mexico. We are a U.S. based firm with our corporate offices in San Diego, California. We have branch offices and recruiting staff in the U.S. (i.e Chicago, Austin) and Mexico (i.e. Monterrey,  Mexico City).

Bogus Academic Credentials And Other Misdeeds in a Challenging Job Market

Category : Interview, Job

By Warren Carter

The economic recession has created an ultra-competitive landscape for the unemployed and/or those seeking a career change.  Increased competition for a shrinking number of career opportunities have forced many active candidates to take a second look at how they’re competing in this tight market. 

This process in and of itself is not such a bad thing for employers or candidates.  Employers are able to find higher qualified talent more readily available than ever before.  Candidates are being forced to hone their skill sets, networking strategies and their career planning which will undoubtedly pay them dividends in the longer term.

One of the negative impacts of the recession is that we are seeing a growing number of candidates that are getting increasingly desperate at how they compete.  Two areas seem to be most common – factual changes to the resume and bogus academic credentials. 

Qualifind invested in candidate tracking software back in 2000 and as the technology has evolved, we have continued to upgrade.  Modern applicant tracking systems allow search firms and corporations to build historical data on candidates.  These systems allow the retention of earlier copies of resumes that were submitted in many cases several years prior.  When a current resume is entered into such a system, they are often tied to the older resume by name.  We find that we have to pay particular attention to comparing such resumes side-by-side.  Such comparison often reveals where candidates have made significant changes to dates of employment in order to mask gaps in employment. 

One of the greatest lapses of integrity seems to be candidate’s reporting phony academic degrees.  U.S. based background screening firm EmployeeScreenIQ recently released a new report, “Smoke, Mirrors and Resumes:  The Growing Threat of Diploma Mills” which is also in line with our findings.  EmployeeScreenIQ states that they are finding an explosion of candidates that are listing bogus academic credentials and also in candidates that are purchasing degrees or credentials from “diploma mills”.

The company conducted a test where they requested a master’s degree in economics for its president and COO, Jason B. Morris.  A prominent diploma mill offered to send him a “genuine” diploma for $75 and for an additional payment of $75, the company would provide verification of the education by phone or e-mail.  EmployeeScreenIQ states that they received the diploma within seven days and that it featured raised seals and was printed on the high grade of paper typically used for framing an academic degree.

Many of these so called “diploma mills” have names that are closely related to accredited institutions, so it is important to do your due diligence in the hiring process!  EmployeeScreenIQ provides the full list of these bogus organizations and you can download the free report at:  http://www.employeescreen.com/whitepapers_articles.asp

Warren Carter is an Executive Recruiter in Qualifind, Inc. You can share your responses with Warren by e-mail at: wcarter@quali-find.com  Qualifind, Inc. provides professional and executive search services for specific disciplines and industries throughout the U.S. and Mexico. We are a U.S. based firm with our corporate offices in San Diego, California. We have branch offices and recruiting staff in the U.S. (i.e Chicago, Austin) and Mexico (i.e. Monterrey,  Mexico City).

Why Diversity Matters Now

Category : Executive Search, Job

by Joe Gerstandt  Nov 24, 2009

Diversity and inclusion may be the most poorly understood issues in business today. While many of us have come to believe that investments in diversity and inclusion are primarily about compliance, political correctness, sensitivity or special treatment, the truth is something different.

Diversity means difference. Difference can show up a lot of different ways, but within the context of work we can probably focus primarily on identity diversity (age, race, gender, geography, etc.), cognitive diversity (different thinking styles, mental orientations, and mental tools), and behavioral and communicative diversity. Diversity and inclusion work at its core is about sustainable and profitable practices — especially the effective and efficient identification, support, and deployment of talent to achieve business objectives.

Not only is there still need for clarity on what diversity and inclusion are, we should also get clear on this business case stuff. Do not be confused by what you have heard or read claiming that there is no business case for diversity, or that the business case is somehow fuzzy. Hogwash. Again, organizational diversity and inclusion work are largely about successfully finding, keeping, and using talent, which is increasingly business critical. The business case for diversity and inclusion is alive and well.

A specific business case is dependent upon the organization and the nature of the actual investment, but a few of the sources of value (explored in more depth in the December 2009 Journal of Corporate Recruiting Leadership) a case can be built on include:

Competitive Advantage

For more and more organizations in more and more industries, innovation is the new opportunity for competitive advantage. This is no secret, as there has been a great deal of discussion and analysis regarding the evolving role of innovation. Innovation is about more than just bringing new products or services to market. It also includes other aspects of business, such as approaches to collaboration, talent management, and engaging new markets.

Despite our affection for the myth of the lone genius, innovation does not take place in isolation. It happens at intersections. It happens when different experiences, perspectives, professions, organizations, and cultures rub up against each other. Without an understanding of, and some appreciation for, the value of difference (in opinion, identity, culture, profession, perspective, etc.) organizations will be hard-pressed to drive sustained innovation. Frans Johansson examines several great examples of this in The Medici Effect, including the story of the great Bletchely Park collaboration, where an incredibly diverse group of characters gathered to break the German coding system during WWII.

Demographic Changes

We are approaching a point where racial and ethnic minorities and women will represent 70% or more of new entrants into the workforce. Organizations that are not good at attracting, engaging, and retaining women and people of color need to fix that quickly, or they are going to be competing for a shrinking percentage of the available talent. Companies that only fix part of this will find themselves with costly retention and engagement problems. Real commitment to workforce diversity is no longer optional.

Talent

Regardless of our intentions, diversity is one of the social variables that can drastically diminish our ability to actually identify talent. In Blink, Malcolm Gladwell shows us an example of this from the world of art. In the not-too-distant past, classical music was largely the domain of white men. “Women, it was believed, simply could not play like men. They didn’t have the strength, the attitude, or the resilience for certain kinds of pieces. Their lips were different. Their lungs were less powerful. Their hands were smaller. None of this seemed like prejudice at the time. It seemed like fact, because when conductors and music directors held auditions, the men always seemed to sound better than the women.”

As part of the push for legal protection, benefits, and fairness in hiring, musicians wanted the audition process to be formalized. This included erecting screens between the auditioner and those evaluating them. “In the past 30 years, since screens became commonplace, the number of women in the top U.S. orchestras has increased fivefold.”

Some of the women who stood out the most in these new auditions were the same women that had auditioned numerous times before the screens were added without making the cut.

I am not talking here about hateful people intentionally discriminating against others. That is another topic altogether. I am talking about human nature getting in the way of our identification of talent. If we want to improve our ability to really identify talent, we have to be aware of the influence of human nature and work to offset it as individuals and organizations.

People, teams, and organizations that are indeed serious about talent must also be serious about diversity and inclusion. Once, again, I am not talking about being tolerant or being sensitive. I am talking about understanding the value of difference and understanding what can easily and quietly get in the way, regardless of our intentions or our character.

The future of your organization may very well depend on it.

http://www.ere.net/2009/11/24/why-diversity-matters-now/#more-10816

Warren Carter is an Executive Recruiter in Qualifind, Inc. You can share your responses with Warren by e-mail at: wcarter@quali-find.com  Qualifind, Inc. provides professional and executive search services for specific disciplines and industries throughout the U.S. and Mexico. We are a U.S. based firm with our corporate offices in San Diego, California. We have branch offices and recruiting staff in the U.S. (i.e Chicago, Austin) and Mexico (i.e. Monterrey,  Mexico City).

Life on Severance: Comfort, Then Crisis

1

Category : Executive Search

By MARY PILON

SILVER SPRING, Md. — Paul Joegriner hasn’t worked since March 2008, when he was laid off from his $200,000-a-year job as chief executive officer of a small bank. But you wouldn’t know it by appearances.

His wife, Marzena, shuttles their two young children to private school every morning. The family recently vacationed in Virginia Beach, Va., and likes to dine on Porterhouse steaks. Since losing his job, Mr. Joegriner, 44 years old, has had several offers. He’s turned each down in hopes of landing a position comparable to what he held before.

When Severance Falls Short

Paul Joegriner attends a job fair at a university near his home in Silver Spring, Md.

Paul Joegriner attends a job fair at a university near his home in Silver Spring, Md.

The family’s lifestyle over the past year and a half has been propped up by a $200,000 severance package and another $100,000 in savings — funds the family has burned through rapidly. By Mr. Joegriner’s own calculations, the family will be out of money in six months if he doesn’t find work.

“It will be D-Day,” he says. “But on the outside, no one has any idea that we’re in trouble.”

Mr. Joegriner is a member of what might be called the severance economy — unemployed Americans who use severance pay and savings to maintain their lifestyles. Many lost their jobs in 2007 and 2008, and thought they’d soon find work. Now, they’re getting desperate. Last week, lawmakers passed a bill extending unemployment benefits up to 20 weeks. Unemployment benefits, which typically last about 26 weeks, were expected to run out for 1.3 million people by the end of the year, according to the National Employment Law Project.

The News Hub panel discusses the newest hurdle the unemployed and laid off are facing: what to do when severance and savings money runs out.

All of this is happening as the long-term jobless rate hits its highest point on record. More than a third of those who are out of work have been looking for more than six months, making this category of unemployed the biggest since the Bureau of Labor Statistics began tracking it in 1948.

Overall, companies have been eliminating or trimming severance packages. For those who do receive severance, the median pay allotted is 12.5 weeks’ salary, down from 21.8 weeks a decade ago, according to outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

But this downturn has brought heavy layoffs to the financial and auto industries, two places where generous exit packages remain more common. The dramatic changes in such sectors mean that many of the eliminated jobs will never come back. Some workers may suffer a permanent hit to their standard of living.

Those affected often have trouble accepting their diminished prospects. Hefty severance packages, while intended as a safety net, can lull the unemployed into a false sense of security. Some people continue spending as before.

“There is an end date when that severance is going to run out,” says Ellen Turf, chief executive of the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors. “At that point, the only life preserver is unemployment or getting another job….It’s an awful situation.”

When Michelle Patterson was laid off as an executive director of marketing for a publishing company in January, she figured she could subsist comfortably, at least for a while, on the $20,000 she had reserved from her savings and severance combined. She continued to eat out regularly and made daily Starbucks runs.

“It made me feel like I was still at work,” says the 41-year-old resident of Newark, N.J. She spent as much as $250 a week on networking meals and drinks with contacts. Some days, she scheduled up to four coffee meetings a day, picking up the tab most of the time. She also spent $30 a month for pedicures and $150 on her hair.

The reckoning came in August, when she examined her finances. Her condo had been on the market for six months but she’d yet to receive a single offer. Her severance and savings were nearly gone.

She finally cut her spending. She doesn’t dine out anymore. Gone are the fancy salon visits; Ms. Patterson sips Starbucks just once a week. She downgraded her cable TV to basic channels, saving $8 a month.

Ms. Patterson sometimes wishes she had cut her spending earlier. But the money spent networking and socializing, she says, has “helped [me] keep sane.” Like many of the long-term unemployed, she surfs sites like Monster.com and is a “serial résumé sender” — emailing at least 10 résumés a day. Still, “I keep running into dead ends,” she says.

Coming to terms with the new job math hasn’t been easy. Ms. Patterson’s old salary was $140,000 a year. Now she is targeting jobs paying about half that. She recently turned down a per-diem arrangement earning $250 a week, or a mere $13,000 a year, selling education software.

After working for more than a decade in New York ad shops, Chuck Hipsher moved to Detroit in 2005. He took a position at the Campbell-Ewald agency, where he helped launch the Chevrolet Silverado campaign. Raised riding in the back of his grandfather’s Chevy pickup in Iowa, Mr. Hipsher, 50, says he was “elated” at the opportunity.

He met his wife at the ad agency, and the two had a $40,000 wedding. Kelly Hipsher, 32, was laid off in October 2007 and found out she was pregnant in February 2008. A week later, Mr. Hipsher’s pink slip followed. Two months after that, the out-of-work couple moved to Greenville, S.C., to be closer to family and get a fresh start. Together, they had received about $60,000 in severance. “Now we have $600 to our name,” says Mr. Hipsher.

Although their rent was cheaper, Mr. Hipsher says the family continued to spend like before. They moved with three cars — two BMWs and a Chevy Silverado. They continued to buy cases of $36-a-bottle wine. They spent $250 a month on a cleaning lady, and Mr. Hipsher dropped $50 a week on flowers for his wife. The couple still dined out regularly.

“We were stupid,” he says. “You become accustomed to a certain lifestyle. When your world changes and things dictate that you change, you’re pretty stubborn to give things up.”

He sold the BMWs and voluntarily turned in his beloved Silverado to avoid the repo man. “It was heartbreaking,” he says. He replaced the fancy wheels with a Chrysler minivan.

Before the layoffs, the Hipshers had no debt. Today, they owe about $70,000 — including money borrowed from family members and $31,000 in credit-card debt. To hold off the collection companies that call daily, Mr. Hipsher says he is doing his best but is also considering filing for personal bankruptcy.

After a stint selling new and used BMWs on a lot in Greenville, Mr. Hipsher recently began consulting for free for a small marketing firm, “to stay busy.”

In September, a Web solutions company hired him as a marketing director. Between salary and commission, he thought he could match half his old income. But so far, he says he’s only received about $1,220. Tight for cash recently, he pawned his wife’s $12,000 wedding ring for a $2,000 loan. He has until Dec. 28 to pay back the principal, plus $500 in interest — or else he forfeits the ring.

Looking back, he kicks himself for failing to enforce financial discipline right after losing his job in Detroit. “That precious nest egg is gone,” he says.

Mr. Joegriner began his career in banking more than 20 years ago, starting out as a part-time teller in Chevy Chase, Md. Even though he was still in college, his goal was to be a CEO. He took night classes to enhance his knowledge of banking.

Mr. Joegriner says he never craved a lavish lifestyle. When the first of their two children was born in 2000, his wife left her $50,000-year-job as a paralegal.The family settled in Silver Spring rather than pricier communities nearby. Instead of tailored suits for $1,000, he bought off-the-rack styles for $300. Mr. Joegriner purchased a Mercedes five years ago, but at auction.

After losing his job, Mr. Joegriner expected to land on his feet within six months, he says. In that time, he turned down three job offers to be a chief financial officer, either because he didn’t like the salary or the description of duties, and thought he could do better. One was nearby; the others would have required the family to move out of state. All paid somewhat less than he had previously earned.

While he says he’s “not a bean counter,” Mr. Joegriner now has mixed emotions about turning down the jobs. He estimates he has sent out about 3,000 copies of his résumé thus far. His severance package included the services of an outplacement firm, but he didn’t find it helpful. “Unemployed people networking with other unemployed people has little value,” he says.

After years of being a chief executive and hiring people, it’s been a tough adjustment. Recently, he began shooting off his résumé for mid- and senior-level positions “just to try and land something.” No replies.

Mr. Joegriner’s mornings now start with a coffee run to the nearby 7-Eleven six days a week. While pouring his regular brew and a cup to take home to his wife, he calculates that by recycling the cups, he receives a 32-cent discount per $1.37 serving. That’s a savings of $3.84 a week, he reckons — even though this small “luxury” for the two of them still costs a total of about $655 a year.

Next, he typically spends a couple of hours doing home repairs. Since his layoff, he’s installed a retaining wall, put under-cabinet lights in the kitchen and tiled a kitchen backsplash for a friend. “It’s my Zen,” he says. He’s holding off outfitting a bathroom sink with a marble countertop.

By late morning, he launches into job-hunt mode. While trolling job Web sites, Mr. Joegriner toggles to a multicolored, multitabulated Excel spreadsheet that calculates the household budget, as well as the “burn rate” through the family’s dwindling savings.

Mr. Joegriner goes grocery shopping in the afternoon. Armed with coupons collected in a shoebox above the fridge, he strides down the aisles, striking out items from his wife’s list with a black pen as he goes. His brow furrows reading the fine print on a cereal coupon his wife handed him. “It says $1.50 off cereal,” he says. “But that’s only if you buy three. So, really, it’s only 50 cents off.”

He pushes his grocery cart on a Friday afternoon through the full parking lot. “Sometimes I look at all this and think, ‘Are we the only ones struggling?’ You look around and see all these cars, it’s like there’s no recession.”

Cutting expenses for their children, Ian and Skye, has been particularly tough, the couple says. Piano lessons are no more and birthday parties are small and held at home. Next year, private-school tuition, which costs $13,000 for the two children, will get the ax.

Mr. Joegriner doesn’t use the word “unemployed” in front of his children, ages 9 and 6, preferring to say that he’s a consultant and that income is patchy. Rough times have even moved him to contemplate seasonal employment this winter, “a stopgap job,” while he continues his executive job search. “Maybe something at night stocking shelves,” he says. “That way people wouldn’t have to see me.”

Mrs. Joegriner recently began looking for work as a paralegal. But finding an employer who can accommodate her schedule with the children, she says, has been difficult.

The Joegriner’s four-bedroom residence is currently worth less than their $460,000 mortgage, but they’re still making monthly payments of $2,400.

The couple is also saddled with two former residences — which they once considered investment properties. While both are income-producing, low rents and declining real-estate values mean that they barely break even. At this point, any sale would likely result in a loss.

Originally committed to staying in the Washington, D.C., area, Mr. Joegriner expanded his search. In September, the family flew to tiny Gillette, Wyo., where Mr. Joegriner was in the final interview stages for a CEO position at a credit union. The salary was $60,000 less than what he earned before, and uprooting his family from Maryland would be difficult. But they all seemed excited about a possible move.

A few days later, Mr. Joegriner received an offer and a contract. Despite the earlier enthusiasm, doubts began to surface. “What if we went all the way out there and they laid me off?” After fruitless negotiations, he turned down the job. The reason: The position didn’t include a guarantee of severance pay. Says Mr. Joegriner: “I just couldn’t take the risk.”

Write to Mary Pilon at mary.pilon@wsj.com

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125780714976639687.html


Warren Carter
is an Executive Recruiter in Qualifind, Inc. You can share your responses with Warren by e-mail at: wcarter@quali-find.com 
Qualifind, Inc. provides professional and executive search services for specific disciplines and industries throughout the U.S. and Mexico. We are a U.S. based firm with our corporate offices in San Diego, California. We have branch offices and recruiting staff in the U.S. (i.e Chicago, Austin) and Mexico (i.e. Monterrey,  Mexico City).